On September 15, 2021 a Party Statement was filed involving a dispute between Schoppman, Shannon Aimee , and for Joint Petition in the District Court of Hampden County.
Preview
4 Commonwealth of Massachusetts The Trial Court Division Hampden ——————__ Probate and Family Court Department Docket Ne: NDO444 AFFIDAVIT OF IRRETRIEVABLE BREAKDOWN Shannon Schoppman Petitioner V. Jeffrey Gagne Petitioner Petitioners state that our marriage has suffered an irretrievable breakdown which began on or about 10/01/2020 (ate) in particular, our marriage has suffered an irretrievable breakdown because: During our marriage we each developed different expectations about the purpose and meaning of our marriage, so that we no longer share any common goals to be attained in our marriage. As a result, our marriage has suffered an irretrievable breakdown as evidenced by a lack of meaningful communication. We agree that reconciliation is not possible. Signed under the penalties of perjury. Date pu be /2) . ; PETITIONER PETITIONER = ( 1 hheonn Ashyze— Ia Y (Signature) j C_) (Signature) Shannon Schoppman Jeffrey Gi Please Printy (Please Print) 29 Colonial Avenue 7 Clearwater Drive (Gireet address) (iret address) Agawam, MA 01001 Rochester, NH 03867 (Ciy/Towny State) (Zip) (City/Town) State) (2p) (Affid. Irretrievable Breakdown 4/07) CGF.Commonwealth of Massachusetts The Trial Court Division Hampden :] Probate and Family Court Department AFFIDAVIT OF IRRETRIEVABLE BREAKDOWN Shannon Schoppman Docket No. 1Do94 | Jeffrey Gagne Petitioners state that our marriage has suffered an irretrievable breakdown which began on or about November 1, 2020 Wate) In particular, our marriage has suffered an irretrievable breakdown because: Sickness and substance abuse Signed under the penalties of perjury. Date June 7, 2021 PETITIONER PETITIONER Dhanmoe hestay— (Signature) (Signature) Shannon Schoppman Jeffey Gagne (Please Printy (Please Printy 29 Colonial Ave 6 Clearview Dr (Sireat address) (Street address) Agawam MA 01001 Rochester NH 03867Case Info
Document Filed DateSeptember 15, 2021
Case Filing DateSeptember 15, 2021
Parties
Sep 13, 2024 | Hyland, Hon. Barbara M | Paternity Managed | Custody/Support/Parenting Time | HD24W1567WD
Sep 10, 2024 | Paternity Managed | IV-D - Complaint to establish paternity filed by IV-D agency | HD24W1544WD
Sep 09, 2024 | Hyland, Hon. Barbara M | Paternity Managed | Custody/Support/Parenting Time | HD24W1538WD
Sep 12, 2024 | Parsenios, Hon. Nicholas L. | Paternity Managed | IV-D Complaint for Support filed by IV-D Agency | HD24W1559WD
Case Number: 24STCP02270 Hearing Date: September 16, 2024 Dept: 9 Petitioner must double check the spelling and legibility of the new name on the proposed decree. If Petitioner is satisfied with the spelling and legibility of the new name on the proposed decree, NO APPEARANCE IS NECESSARY. If the new name is not clearly written and correctly spelled on the proposed decree, Petitioner must appear at the hearing to submit a corrected proposed decree. The petition is granted. A copy of the signed decree will be available in Room 112 of the Clerk's Office seven days after the date of the hearing. Once the proposed decree is signed, it cannot be amended without a new petition to change name.
Case Number: 24STCP02209 Hearing Date: September 9, 2024 Dept: 9 Petitioner must double check the spelling and legibility of the new name on the proposed decree. If Petitioner is satisfied with the spelling and legibility of the new name on the proposed decree, NO APPEARANCE IS NECESSARY. If the new name is not clearly written and correctly spelled on the proposed decree, Petitioner must appear at the6hearing to submit a corrected proposed decree. The petition is granted. A copy of the signed decree will be available in Room 112 of the Clerk's Office seven days after the date of the hearing. Once the proposed decree is signed, it cannot be amended without a new petition to change name.
DATE: 09/06/24 TIME: 9:00 A.M. DEPT: D CASE NO: FL0001091 PRESIDING: HON. BETH S. JORDAN REPORTER: CLERK: STACY BOND. PETITIONER: DIANA ROQUE CARDONA and RESPONDENT: ALEXANDER MANSFIELD NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: REQUEST FOR ORDER — CHILD CUSTODY/VISITATION RULING This matter is set for hearing on Respondent/Father’s 7/17/24 Request for Order (“RFO”) to modify child custody/visitation with respect to the parties’ daughter, Izabella (“Izzy” DOB S-25- 18). Mother filed her Responsive Declaration on 8/26/24 opposing Father’s requests. The parties met separately with Family Court Services (“FCS”) on 8/22/24, and FCS filed their Report & Recommendations with the Court on 8/29/24. The current custody orders were made in Sonoma County on 2/22/21 and award sole legal and physical custody of Izabella to Petitioner/Mother, with Father having visits with Izabella every Tuesday from 2:30 to 7:30 and every Friday from 3:00 pm through Saturday at 3:00 pm. There is a history of involvement with Children and Family Services. Father is seeking joint physical and legal custody of Izzy; he states that when the custody order was made, the parties intended to marry and be a family, but circumstances have changed, and he has struggled with visitations and communications with Mother. He has not seen Izzy since May of 2023. Mother states that she has been in therapy and working with the Center for Domestic Peace since the beginning of 2020, and that Izzy has been traumatized by Father and has received therapy for the last year as a result. Mother further states that she has tried to work with Father to visit with Izzy, but Father refused to accept her boundaries, has harassed her, verbally abused her and showed up at her house uninvited. This creates additional trauma and tension for her and Izzy. The Court notes that, although Mother attempted to get a restraining order against Father, the request was denied by the Sonoma County Court. After consideration of the parties’ pleadings, as well as the FCS Report & Recommendations, the Court finds that it is in the best interests of Izzy to adopt the recommendations of FCS, as modified below: ieee FL0001091 Parental Responsibilities: Mother shall continue to have sole legal custody of Izabella. Mother shall make decisions about matters concerning Izabella’s health, education and welfare. However, both parents shall have access to Izabella’s school, medical, mental health, and dental records and the right to consult with professionals who are providing services to her. 2. Mother shall continue to have sole physical custody of Izabella. Timeshare Schedule 3. Izabella shall continue to live with Mother and she shall have professionally supervised visits with Father through Rally one time each week for up to one hour. Collateral Issues 4. Izabella shall continue in therapy and all recommendations by her therapist shall be followed. The parents shall engage in peaceful contact only in the presence of Izabella. Izabella shall not be exposed to any verbal or physical abuse. Neither parent shall make any disparaging comments about the other parent in the presence of Izabella, or allow others to do so. SO ORDERED. The Court will prepare the Order per Rule 5.125, California Rules of Court TEMPORARILY, under current orders, litigants who require the assistance of a Spanish language interpreter shall appear in person. Interpreter services via video technology are currently not available. Any party contesting the ruling and requesting oral argument shall appear in person or remotely through Zoom either by video or telephone. Please follow the guidelines set forth on the court website at www.marin.courts.ca.gov The Zoom appearance information is as follows: September 2024 at 09:00 AM Join Zoom Meeting Zoom link for Courtroom D Family Law 161 0592888 passcode 841800 Meeting ID: 161 059 2888 Passcode: 841800 Page 2 of 3 FL0001091 If you are only able to appear by phone you may dial the phone number below, follow the prompts and enter the meeting ID and passcode. +1-669-254-5252 US (San Jose) Meeting ID: 161 059 2888 Passcode: 841800 If a party and/or counsel elects to appear over Zoom they must follow proper Zoom etiquette. This includes joining the call five minutes early, speaking only one at a time, avoiding disruptions, and wearing proper attire appropriate for a court environment. Parties must act and speak in a professional and respectful manner as though they are in an actual courtroom. If a party or counsel is unable to follow proper Zoom etiquette, the court may halt the hearing and order the parties to return in person. Page 3 of 3 RES RS SSS SC
Case Number: 24STCP02284 Hearing Date: September 16, 2024 Dept: 9 The petition is CONTINUED to November 4, 2024 at 9:30 am. No proof of publication has been filed. Petitioner must file proof of publication no later than one week before the continued hearing date. Failure to do so will result in denial and dismissal of the petition without prejudice. Court Clerk to give notice.
Case Number: 24STCP02231 Hearing Date: September 16, 2024 Dept: 9 Petitioner must double check the spelling and legibility of the new name on the proposed decree. If Petitioner is satisfied with the spelling and legibility of the new name on the proposed decree, NO APPEARANCE IS NECESSARY. If the new name is not clearly written and correctly spelled on the proposed decree, Petitioner must appear at the hearing to submit a corrected proposed decree. The petition is granted. A copy of the signed decree will be available in Room 112 of the Clerk's Office seven days after the date of the hearing. Once the proposed decree is signed, it cannot be amended without a new petition to change name.
FL-24-001867 – DICKINSON VS DICKINSON Petitioner’s Request for Order re Child Custody, etc.—HEARING REQUIED. All requests but property control are not eligible for tentative ruling and require a hearing. That said, Petitioner did not file and serve an Income and Expense Declaration, as required given the economic requests at issue. (Cal. Rules of Ct., rule 5.92(b)(2),(3).) Respondent has not filed a Responsive Declaration and also has not filed and served a current Income and Expense Declaration. Regarding pendente lite attorney and professional fees, Petitioner did not file and serve the FL-319 attachment as required. (Cal. Rules of Ct., rule 5.427(b)(1).) Regarding property control, there is a pending DV hearing seeking the same relief that is set for the same date/time as the present and will therefore be addressed in that context and pursuant to that authority. As both parties are represented, counsel are directed to meet and confer in an effort to limit or narrow the scope of both hearings. (Cal. Rules of Ct., rule 5.98.)
24CV02665 In re: Carmack, Jenna Renee EVENT: Change of Name (Adult) The Court will hear from Petitioner.
FL-22-000974 – POUNDS VS LBS Petitioner’s Request for Order re Elisor—HEARING REQUIRED. The Court finds that proof of service is on file and demonstrates presumptively valid and timely mail service of Respondent in compliance with Family Code section 215 and the Rules of Court as to post-judgment order requests. Respondent did not file a Responsive Declaration or any other opposition. Accordingly, based on Petitioner’s declaration and the final Judgment entered on June 20, 2023, the Court finds that Petitioner has established satisfactory grounds for the Court to order that the clerk be appointed elisor to sign the subject deed on Respondent’s behalf. However, Petitioner must first submit a proposed order for the Court’s review and signature that complies with the Local Rules. (See, Local Rules, rule 7.08(A).) Petitioner may wish to seek legal advice at her own expense, but is also welcome to contact the Court’s Self-Help Center for free assistance with legal forms and procedures.
Sep 13, 2024 | Randle, Hon. Ellen M | Paternity Managed | Custody/Support/Parenting Time | HD24W1587WD